Why spend ten minutes describing a noise when a ten second clip shows it? Video belongs in inspections, but only if it is kept short and tied to something specific.
A picture is worth a thousand words, but in a property inspection a short video can be worth considerably more. Sometimes, walking through a property, it simply makes more sense to record a few seconds of video than to take a photo and then write a paragraph explaining what the photo cannot show.
Three situations come up repeatedly: communicating with a tenant (the trick to lighting a temperamental stove, or turning a key in a stiff lock), explaining a fault to a servicer in a repair request, and capturing a condition that involves sound or motion, like a noisy fan or a dripping tap.
Inspection procedures should never produce one or two long meandering videos, which is exactly why zInspector limits clip size. A video should focus on a single area, room or system, and ideally on a specific detail within it.
A specific clip focused on one area or activity provides far better documentation than an epic twenty minute walkthrough. You will never again lose an hour scrolling a hard drive folder or scrubbing through a long video looking for a condition you need to point to in a conversation with an owner or tenant, or when preparing for court.
Incredibly tedious becomes genuinely easy, which is the only kind of process improvement that survives contact with a busy week.
Because long videos are unusable as evidence. A twenty minute walkthrough contains everything and proves nothing you can find quickly. Short clips tied to a detail are retrievable.
As many as you need. The constraint is on individual clip length rather than the number of clips in an inspection.
That is one of the strongest uses. A repair request with ten seconds of the actual fault removes an entire round of clarifying questions.
Record one clip on your next inspection and send it with the repair request.